Demystifying Reading

I am not skilled at writing, nor I do enjoy reading as a hobby. I never really acquired the taste for writing or reading anything that wasn't purely required. So, most of the text I come across are things like translations, articles, instructions and similar technical writings.

I never really got into reading novels or fiction, and I never really understood the craze. I do agree that there are important and iconic books out there, but sadly, I never really developed this taste in my teenage years and I find it difficult to cultivate it now.

I don't know if this is correct, or just my inaccurate assumption, but I feel like the act of reading may be a bit overrated in some parts.

Do not get me wrong. I am aware that reading can be a fulfilling, enjoyable and constructive hobby, and any time spent away from the screens is commendable. However, I do not think that reading is an inherently "high-brow", intellectual activity just because of that. I personally spend more time looking at screens, sure, but I'm always pursuing creative endeavors and fostering fun group activities with friends.

Let's also not forget that books are not immune from rabid fans, who believe that their hobby completely and thoroughly molds their personality.

I guess what I want to say is that we should always policy ourselves not to be conceited with your own hobbies. We should be humble and not assume that one hobby is better than the other, or how the way you engage with art is better than the way others do.

I've started to read more novels this year, and I'm enjoying it so far. But I want it to be a thing that adds to my list of interests, not something that is exclusive.